In modern classrooms, training centers, and collaborative workspaces, an interactive whiteboard is no longer just a display—it is the core interaction platform. Writing, annotating, dragging, and multi-user collaboration must feel instant and natural.
Yet in the market, performance is often reduced to a single number:
“20 points, 40 points, 50 points… the higher, the better.”
On paper, higher touch-point counts look impressive. In real-world usage, however, touch quality is defined by stability, precision, latency control, and algorithm optimization, not theoretical maximum inputs.
At Qtenboard, where interactive whiteboards are engineered and tested daily, we see a clear pattern: systems optimized for real usage consistently outperform those designed for headline specifications.
This article explains the engineering behind infrared (IR) touch technology, clarifies common misconceptions about multi-touch counts, and explores how thoughtful system design leads to better user experience.
Infrared (IR) touch is the dominant solution for large-format interactive whiteboards, typically from 65" to 110" and beyond.
Instead of sensing electrical properties like capacitive systems, IR touch creates an invisible grid of infrared beams across the display. A touch interrupts these beams, and the controller calculates the touch position.
Works with fingers, gloves, styluses, or pointers
No pressure required for detection
Independent of glass or panel thickness
Scales efficiently to large sizes
Reliable for multi-user environments
For large interactive whiteboards, IR provides stable group interaction without the cost and scalability limits of large PCAP panels.
An infrared frame is a precision opto-electronic system—not just a sensor border.
Industrial-grade LEDs (850–940 nm) for stable output
Controlled spacing for accurate resolution
Strict alignment for uniform detection
The controller defines real performance. High-quality systems enable:
Noise filtering
Palm and pen rejection
Conflict resolution for multi-touch inputs
Ghost-point suppression
Mechanical precision matters:
High flatness prevents dead zones
Tight tolerances ensure edge responsiveness
Stable assembly prevents drift over time
True performance comes from system integration, not component count.
Touch points represent the maximum simultaneous inputs a system can detect.
| Touch Points | Typical Scenario |
|---|---|
| 20 | Standard multi-user use |
| 30–40 | Education collaboration |
| 50 | Group interaction |
| 60–80 | Specialized OEM projects |
However, higher counts introduce trade-offs:
Denser beam grids increase signal overlap
Processing demand rises
Risk of false touches grows
Real scenarios rarely exceed 10–15 touches
Key insight: A stable 20–40 point system often delivers a better experience than an unstable 80-point configuration.
| Feature | Infrared (IR) | Capacitive (PCAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Methods | Finger, glove, stylus | Finger, conductive stylus |
| Scalability | Excellent for large sizes | Limited at large sizes |
| Accuracy | High | Very high |
| Writing Feel | Very good | Excellent |
| Glass Thickness Impact | None | Significant |
| Large-Panel Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Maintenance | Frame replaceable | Glass replacement |
| Ideal Use | Large collaboration | Precision tasks |
PCAP excels on smaller, precision-focused panels. IR is optimized for large collaborative screens.
Infrared touch enables:
Stable multi-user interaction
Tool flexibility (gloves, styluses)
Lower maintenance cost
Consistent long-term performance
These advantages are critical in high-traffic environments like schools and training centers.
As a manufacturer, Qtenboard optimizes systems based on real use cases:
Adjustable touch points (20–80)
Custom LED spacing & scan rates
Algorithm tuning for handwriting and rejection
Integration with various panel structures
Each system is tuned for its environment, not just standardized for marketing.
Writing quality depends on:
Algorithm optimization
Sampling rate
Controller latency
Panel alignment
Not touch-point count.
IR offers stable multi-user collaboration across large surfaces, while PCAP offers ultra-smooth single-user precision.
IR touch performs well under varied conditions:
Gloves and stylus support
High interaction frequency
Simple maintenance
PCAP may be affected by moisture, costlier repairs, and stylus limits.
For public and educational spaces, IR remains more robust.
Q1: Can IR exceed 50 points?
Yes, for OEM projects.
Q2: Why recommend 20–50 points?
Because stability outweighs theoretical maximums.
Q3: Do more points improve writing?
No—algorithms and latency matter more.
Q4: Size recommendations?
≤55" PCAP | ≥55" IR
Q5: Glove support?
Yes—one of IR’s strengths.
Great interactive whiteboards are engineered systems, not spec-sheet contests.
By focusing on:
Size-appropriate technology
Balanced touch-point design
Algorithm optimization
Mechanical precision
Qtenboard delivers interactive whiteboards built for real users and real environments.
For classrooms and collaboration spaces, stability, responsiveness, and reliability always matter more than headline numbers.
That is the Qtenboard engineering philosophy.
In modern classrooms, training centers, and collaborative workspaces, an interactive whiteboard is no longer just a display—it is the core interaction platform. Writing, annotating, dragging, and multi-user collaboration must feel instant and natural.
Yet in the market, performance is often reduced to a single number:
“20 points, 40 points, 50 points… the higher, the better.”
On paper, higher touch-point counts look impressive. In real-world usage, however, touch quality is defined by stability, precision, latency control, and algorithm optimization, not theoretical maximum inputs.
At Qtenboard, where interactive whiteboards are engineered and tested daily, we see a clear pattern: systems optimized for real usage consistently outperform those designed for headline specifications.
This article explains the engineering behind infrared (IR) touch technology, clarifies common misconceptions about multi-touch counts, and explores how thoughtful system design leads to better user experience.
Infrared (IR) touch is the dominant solution for large-format interactive whiteboards, typically from 65" to 110" and beyond.
Instead of sensing electrical properties like capacitive systems, IR touch creates an invisible grid of infrared beams across the display. A touch interrupts these beams, and the controller calculates the touch position.
Works with fingers, gloves, styluses, or pointers
No pressure required for detection
Independent of glass or panel thickness
Scales efficiently to large sizes
Reliable for multi-user environments
For large interactive whiteboards, IR provides stable group interaction without the cost and scalability limits of large PCAP panels.
An infrared frame is a precision opto-electronic system—not just a sensor border.
Industrial-grade LEDs (850–940 nm) for stable output
Controlled spacing for accurate resolution
Strict alignment for uniform detection
The controller defines real performance. High-quality systems enable:
Noise filtering
Palm and pen rejection
Conflict resolution for multi-touch inputs
Ghost-point suppression
Mechanical precision matters:
High flatness prevents dead zones
Tight tolerances ensure edge responsiveness
Stable assembly prevents drift over time
True performance comes from system integration, not component count.
Touch points represent the maximum simultaneous inputs a system can detect.
| Touch Points | Typical Scenario |
|---|---|
| 20 | Standard multi-user use |
| 30–40 | Education collaboration |
| 50 | Group interaction |
| 60–80 | Specialized OEM projects |
However, higher counts introduce trade-offs:
Denser beam grids increase signal overlap
Processing demand rises
Risk of false touches grows
Real scenarios rarely exceed 10–15 touches
Key insight: A stable 20–40 point system often delivers a better experience than an unstable 80-point configuration.
| Feature | Infrared (IR) | Capacitive (PCAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Methods | Finger, glove, stylus | Finger, conductive stylus |
| Scalability | Excellent for large sizes | Limited at large sizes |
| Accuracy | High | Very high |
| Writing Feel | Very good | Excellent |
| Glass Thickness Impact | None | Significant |
| Large-Panel Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Maintenance | Frame replaceable | Glass replacement |
| Ideal Use | Large collaboration | Precision tasks |
PCAP excels on smaller, precision-focused panels. IR is optimized for large collaborative screens.
Infrared touch enables:
Stable multi-user interaction
Tool flexibility (gloves, styluses)
Lower maintenance cost
Consistent long-term performance
These advantages are critical in high-traffic environments like schools and training centers.
As a manufacturer, Qtenboard optimizes systems based on real use cases:
Adjustable touch points (20–80)
Custom LED spacing & scan rates
Algorithm tuning for handwriting and rejection
Integration with various panel structures
Each system is tuned for its environment, not just standardized for marketing.
Writing quality depends on:
Algorithm optimization
Sampling rate
Controller latency
Panel alignment
Not touch-point count.
IR offers stable multi-user collaboration across large surfaces, while PCAP offers ultra-smooth single-user precision.
IR touch performs well under varied conditions:
Gloves and stylus support
High interaction frequency
Simple maintenance
PCAP may be affected by moisture, costlier repairs, and stylus limits.
For public and educational spaces, IR remains more robust.
Q1: Can IR exceed 50 points?
Yes, for OEM projects.
Q2: Why recommend 20–50 points?
Because stability outweighs theoretical maximums.
Q3: Do more points improve writing?
No—algorithms and latency matter more.
Q4: Size recommendations?
≤55" PCAP | ≥55" IR
Q5: Glove support?
Yes—one of IR’s strengths.
Great interactive whiteboards are engineered systems, not spec-sheet contests.
By focusing on:
Size-appropriate technology
Balanced touch-point design
Algorithm optimization
Mechanical precision
Qtenboard delivers interactive whiteboards built for real users and real environments.
For classrooms and collaboration spaces, stability, responsiveness, and reliability always matter more than headline numbers.
That is the Qtenboard engineering philosophy.